Pemenuhan Hak Korban Anak dalam Tindak Pidana Berat: Kajian Yuridis Putusan 3/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/PN.Jkt.Pst
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v11i2.5866Keywords:
Child Protection, Victims of Serious Crimes, Restitution, Rehabilitation, Juvenile Justice, Perlindungan Anak, Korban Tindak Pidana Berat, Restitusi, Rehabilitasi, Peradilan Anak.Abstract
Abstract
Children who become victims of serious crimes have rights guaranteed by the state through Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection. However, the fulfilment of these rights, particularly restitution and rehabilitation, remains suboptimal. This study is important to analyse the extent to which the law ensures the fulfilment of child victims’ rights and how its implementation is reflected in the Central Jakarta District Court Decision Number 3/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/PN.Jkt.Pst. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory and case study approach. The results show that although the Child Protection Law provides a strong normative basis, judicial practice still prioritizes the best interests of the child offender. This study concludes that strengthening the implementation mechanism for fulfilling child victims’ rights is essential to achieve a balance between the protection of offenders and victims within the juvenile criminal justice system.
Abstrak
Anak sebagai korban tindak pidana berat memiliki hak yang dijamin oleh negara melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Namun, pemenuhan hak tersebut, khususnya terkait restitusi dan rehabilitasi, masih belum optimal. Penelitian ini penting dilakukan untuk menganalisis sejauh mana ketentuan dalam undang-undang tersebut menjamin pemenuhan hak-hak anak korban tindak pidana berat serta bagaimana implementasinya berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 3/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/PN.Jkt.Pst. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun secara normatif perlindungan terhadap korban anak telah diatur, praktik peradilan lebih menitikberatkan pada kepentingan terbaik bagi pelaku anak. Simpulan penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya penguatan mekanisme implementasi pemenuhan hak korban anak guna mewujudkan keseimbangan antara perlindungan terhadap pelaku dan korban.
References
Allison Morris and Gabrielle Maxwell, Restorative Justice for Juveniles: Conferencing, Mediation and Circle (Hart Publishing 2001).
Edna Erez and Pamela Tontodonato, ‘The Effect of Victim Participation in Sentencing on Sentence Outcome’ (1990) 28 Criminology 451; Wemmers (n 106).
Gioia Greco, ‘Victims’ Rights Overview under the ICC Legal Framework: A Jurisprudential Analysis’ (2007) 7 International Criminal Law Review 531; Claire Garbett, ‘From Passive Objects to Active Agents: A Comparative Study of Conceptions of Victim Identities at the ICTY and ICC’ (2016) 15 Journal of Human Rights 40.
Jeffrey Kennedy, ‘The Citizen Victim: Reconciling the Public and Private in Criminal Sentencing’ (2019) 13 Criminal Law and Philosophy 83.
Lili Rasjidi & I.B. Wyasa Putra, Hukum sebagai Sistem, (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2003).
Marilyn Fernandez, Restorative Justice for Domestic Violence Victims: An Integrated Approach to Their Hunger for Healing (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc 2010); Walgrave (n 113).
Ria Juliana and Ridwan Arifin, ‘Anak Dan Kejahatan (Faktor Penyebab Dan Perlindungan Hukum)’ (2019) 6 Jurnal Selat 225.
Risna Sidabutar and Suhatrizal, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Pada Putusan No.2/Pid.Sus/2014PN.Mdn’ (2018) 5 Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum 22
Robyn L Holder and Elizabeth Englezos, ‘Victim Participation in Criminal Justice: A Quantitative Systematic and Critical Literature Review’ (2024) 30 International Review of Victimology 25.
Shen (n 84); Yannick van den Brink, ‘Young, Accused and Detained; Awful, But Lawful? Pre-Trial Detention and Children’s Rights Protection in Contemporary Western Societies’ (2019) 19 Youth Justice 238.
Soedjono Dirdjosisworo, Hukum Perlindungan Anak, (Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2001).
Theo Gavrielides and Vasso Artinopoulou, Reconstructing Restorative Justice Philisophy (Routledge 2013); Wenzel and others (n 115).
Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak
Zuliah and Ablisar (n 69); Hilda Prabayani Putri, ‘Legal Review Concerning the Right to Restitution for Child Victims of Crime of Sexual Crimes According to Children’s Protection Law’ (2022) 05 International Journal of Social Science And Human Research 5668; Juliana and Arifin (n 97).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia by Editor is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
