PENALARAN HUKUM YANG MAMPU MEWUJUDKAN TUJUAN HUKUM SECARA PROPORSIONAL

Agus Setiawan

Abstract


On the activity of legal reasoning, legal objective embodiment in the form of: justice, legal certainty, and kemanfaaan sometimes not achieved proportionately or even forgot or did not understand that the purpose of law should be the third contained proportionally in any legal ruling.  The third objective will be achieved proportionately, by finding the point of the link between the reasoning of the law with the purpose of the law, the law of nature and the methods used to achieve the third objective of the law.

The research was carried out using the method of legal research is research that is interdisciplinary collaboration and integration of the disciplines of law and other disciplines, which in this case is a philosophy.  This research is a study of the legal reasoning of how capable of realizing justice, legal certainty and benefit proportionately.  Therefore the examined was how the point links between legal reasoning with the purpose of the law, as well as what is the meaning of the law (the ontological aspect) and what is the method to achieve it (epistemological aspect).

Research proves that there is a link between the point of law raised by Gustav Radbruch, namely: justice, legal certainty, and the benefit with the aksiologis of models of legal reasoning advanced by Shidarta.  With regard to the activity of the legal reasoning that is capable of realizing justice, legal certainty, and benefit proportionally; found that all the arguments of yuridik which is a legal ruling made by establishing practical law was supposed to interpret the law as positive norms within the system of legislation that pay attention to the principles of truth and justice universal or moral, the behavioral pattern of the terlembaga, and the symbolic meanings of social actors.

Whereas the epistemological aspects of the law which is its method is deductive reasoning patterns doctrinal-in order to be empowered in order to achieve legal certainty and fairness as well as simultaneously using inductive reasoning patterns nondoktrinal-so are empowered to achieve benefit.  The pattern of reasoning is identical with the model of thought problematic tersistematisasi.

 

Keywords: Law, Proportional Reasoning, the purpose of the law.


Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Buku

Bernard Arief Sidharta, Refleksi Tentang Struktur Ilmu Hukum – Sebuah penelitian tentang fundasi kefilsafatan dan sifat kelimuan Ilmu Hukum sebagai landasan pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia, Cet. Ketiga, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2009.

B. Arief Sidharta, Pengantar Logika – Sebuah Langkah Pertama Pengenalan Medan Telaah, Cet. Ketiga, Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2010.

Bernard Arief Sidharta et all, Pengembanan Hukum Teoretis Refleksi atas Konstelasi Disiplin Hukum, Cet. pertama, Bandung: Logoz Publishing, 2014.

Esmi Warassih et. all, Penelitian Hukum Interdisipliner sebuah pengantar menuju sosio-legal, Cet. I, Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2016.

I Dewa Gede Atmadja, Filsafat Hukum-Dimensi Tematis dan Historis, Malang-jawa Timur: Setara Press (Kelompok Penerbit Intrans), 2013.

Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: Alumni, 1986.

Shidarta, Hukum Penalaran dan Penalaran Hukum, Cet. I, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2013.

B. Jurnal dan Internet

B. Arief Sidharta, Penalaran Hukum, karya yang tidak dipublikasikan, ada pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Parahyangan.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v3i2.257

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


JHMJ (Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia) INDEXED BY :


 

 

 

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
CC BY-NC-SA

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms.