TRANSFORMASI ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK MENGGUNAKAN DIGITAL FORENSIK DALAM PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM ACARA PIDANA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35194/jj.v5i01.5506Keywords:
Akuntabilitas, Bukti, Digital, Forensik, Pidana, Accountability, Evidence, Forensics, Criminal.Abstract
ABSTRAK
Perkembangan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi telah mendorong pergeseran sistem pembuktian pidana ke arah digitalisasi, di mana bukti elektronik memainkan peran penting dalam mengungkap tindak pidana. Meskipun telah diakui secara normatif dalam UU ITE dan RUU KUHAP, penerapan bukti elektronik masih menghadapi tantangan prosedural, khususnya terkait keabsahan dan integritasnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis urgensi integrasi digital forensik sebagai syarat formil keabsahan bukti elektronik dalam pembaharuan hukum acara pidana. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi deskriptif-analitis, yang mengkaji data sekunder berupa peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur hukum, dan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketiadaan standar operasional prosedur digital forensik menyebabkan inkonsistensi penilaian alat bukti di pengadilan, mengancam kepastian hukum, dan membuka peluang pelanggaran hak terdakwa. Oleh karena itu, reformasi hukum acara pidana harus diarahkan pada penguatan regulasi teknis digital forensik sebagai bagian integral sistem pembuktian pidana di era digital.
ABSTRACT
The development of information and communication technology has encouraged a shift in the criminal evidence system towards digitalization, where electronic evidence plays an important role in uncovering criminal acts. Although it has been normatively recognized in the ITE Law and the KUHAP Bill, the application of electronic evidence still faces procedural challenges, especially regarding its validity and integrity. This research aims to analyze the urgency of digital forensic integration as a formal requirement for the validity of electronic evidence in the reform of criminal procedure law. The method used is a normative juridical approach with descriptive-analytical specifications, which examines secondary data in the form of laws and regulations, legal literature, and case studies. The results showed that the absence of standard operating procedures for digital forensics led to inconsistencies in the assessment of evidence in court, threatened legal certainty, and opened up opportunities for violations of defendants' rights. Therefore, criminal procedure law reform should be directed at strengthening the technical regulation of digital forensics as an integral part of the criminal evidence system in the digital era.
References
Adzkari, F., & Rahmat, D. (2024). Kekuatan Pembuktian Alat Bukti CCTV (Closed Circuit Television) dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Umum Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 20 PUU-XIV/2016. Lex Laguens: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 2(3), 14–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.08221/lexlaguens.v2i1.62
Berlian, & Firdaus, A. (2022). Good Governance Melalui Kebijakan Berbasis Bukti Reformulasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Nasional. Jurnal Yuridis, 9(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v9i1.3847
Cahyadri, R. A. (2021). Apa Yang Harus Ditanyakan Kepada Ahli Digital Forensics?? (Panduan Bagi Praktisi Hukum). Deepublish.
Cahyono, S. T., Erni, W., & Hidayat, T. (2025). Rekonstruksi Hukum Pidana terhadap Kejahatan Siber (Cyber Crime) dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. DJL| Dame Journal of Law, 1(1), 1–23. https://journals.yapilin.com/index.php/djh/article/view/6
Chatlina, C. B., Mulyana, A., & Amalia, M. (2024). Pengaruh Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Terhadap Kualitas Hubungan Sosial dalam Keluarga. Komunitas: Jurnal Ilmu Sosiologi, 7(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30598/komunitasvol7issue1page19-38
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth edit). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469237-3
Diana, L. (2018). Setya Novanto Akui Rekaman Jaksa KPK di Sidang E-KTP. Tempo. https://www.tempo.co/hukum/setya-novanto-akui-rekaman-jaksa-kpk-di-sidang-e-ktp-967756
Edrisy, I. F. (2019). Pengantar Hukum Siber (Kamilatun (ed.)). Sai Wawai Publishing.
Famudin. (2023). Discourse of Electronic Evidence-Based Police Investigation in The Era of Digital Transformation. Jurnal Legalitas, 16(2), 198–216. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v16i2.20901
Fitri, S. M. (2020). Urgensi Pengaturan Alat Bukti Elektronik sebagai Upaya Mencapai Kepastian Hukum. Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.37729/amnesti.v2i1.659
Flora, H. S., Rinaldi, K., Mudjrimin, J., Saraya, S., Handayani, Y., Jaya, R., Laksono, R. D., Koynja, J. J., Yesami, L., & Malau, P. (2024). Hukum Pidana Di Era Digital. Cv. Rey Media Grafika.
Habibi, M. R., & Liviani, I. (2020). Kejahatan Teknologi Informasi (Cyber Crime) dan Penanggulangannya dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam, 23(2), 400–426. https://doi.org/10.15642/alqanun.2020.23.2.400-426
Handoyo, B., MZ, H., Rahma, I., & Asy’ari. (2024). Tinjaun Yuridis Penegakkan Hukum Kejahatan Cyber Crime Studi Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008. MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 4(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.47498/maqasidi.v4i1.2966
Hartanto, Hakimi, A. C., & Munawar, S. (2024). Perbandingan Sanksi Pidana Pasal Tertentu Undang- Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE No.11 Tahun 2008 dan No 19 Tahun 2016). Presumption of Law, 6(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31949/jpl.v6i1.4613
Hartono, M. S., & Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2020). Penggunaan Bukti Elektronik dalam Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 6(1), 281–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v6i1.23607
Haryadi, I. (2024). Peran Yurisprudensi dalam Pengembangan Hukum Pidana di Era Digital. Yudhistira: Jurnal Yurisprudensi Hukum Dan Peradilan, 2(3), 42–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59966/yudhistira.v2i3.1668
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2012). Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian. Erlangga.
Ibrahim, Tahir, M., & Basoddin. (2021). Tinjauan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Cyber Crime (Suatu Studi di Reskrimum Polda Sultra). Sultra Law Review, 3(2), 1759–1774.
Kasidin, S. (2021). Kajian Hukum Tentang Kekuatan Alat Bukti Yang Dipublikasikan Oleh Seorang Ahli Di Luar Pemeriksaan Persidangan Dihubungkan Pasal 184 Kuhap. FOCUS: Jurnal of Law, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.47685/focus.v2i1.175
Mantik, V. L. M. T., Watulingas, R. R., & Muaja, H. S. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Kedudukan Alat Bukti Digital Dalam Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Mayantara (Cyber Crime). Lex Privatum, 10(5), 1–9. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/42870
Nugraha, A. A., Lukitaningtyas, Y. K. R. D., Ridho, A., Wulansari, H., & Al Romadhona, R. A. (2022). Cybercrime, Pancasila, and Society: Various Challenges in the Era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0. Indonesian Journal of Pancasila and Global Constitutionalism, 1(2), 307–390. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijpgc.v1i2.59802
Pokol, B. (2004). Teori Sosiologis (terjemahan). Századvég Kiadó.
Putra, S. S. (2024). Kekuatan Bukti Elektronik dalam Pembuktian Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia [Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang]. https://repository.unissula.ac.id/38189/1/Magister Ilmu Hukum_20302300224_fullpdf.pdf
Sintya Dewi, N. P. C., Rai Yuliartini, N. P., & Sudika Mangku, D. G. (2021). Kedudukan Rekaman Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia (Studi Putusan No.777/Pid.B/2016/PN.JKT.PST). Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 4(2), 510–520. https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v4i2.38141
Sitompul, J. (2018). Improving the Role of Experts under Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law: Lessons Learned From the Dutch Legal System. Indonesia Law Review, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v8n1.385
Susanti, D. I. (2019). Penafsiran Hukum: Teori dan Metode. Sinar Grafika.
Wibowo, A. (2023). Hukum di Era Globalisasi Digital. Penerbit Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik Bekerja sama dengan Universitas Sains & Teknologi Komputer (Universitas STEKOM).
Wulandari, W., & Moeliono, T. P. (2024). Anotasi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Perkara Nomor: No. 665/K/Pid/2014. Dictum: Jurnal Kajian Putusan Pengadilan, 16, 22–47. https://leip.or.id/dictum-vol-16-penyiksaan-dalam-peradilan-pidana/
Zaki, M. F. (2023). Ahli Digital Forensik Anggap Bukti WhatsApp Teddy Minahasa dengan Dody Prawiranegara Tidak Sah. Tempo. https://www.tempo.co/hukum/ahli-digital-forensik-anggap-bukti-whatsapp-teddy-minahasa-dengan-dody-prawiranegara-tidak-sah-209646
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
