Evaluation of Learning Media (Textbooks) in Area of Square and Rectangle to Prepare Student in Problem Solving: Praxeological Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v12i1.2887Keywords:
mathematics textbooks, media learning mathematics praxeology, square and rectangle areaAbstract
Textbooks are one of the learning media that need to be evaluated objectively because textbooks are a form of curriculum implementation that teachers usually use in the classroom. Many developed countries pay more attention to this study such as Japan, America, Holland, so textbook studies have been widely recognized as a field of scientific research. According to the Theory of Didactical Situations, the content of the material being taught must allow students to think. to make an objective analysis of the book, Researchers used Praxeology in this study. Praxeology, initiated by Chevallard, helps researchers see the reasons behind human action in textbooks and math. Based on the praxiological analysis, the result is that the design of the textbook does not provide techniques that facilitate students to acquire theory independently. In addition, the situations and actions students should go through need to be properly accommodated. This guides researchers to create alternative designs to provide meaningful learning experiences on broad flat material referring to the Theory of Didactic Situations.
References
Bosch, M., Gascón, J., & Trigueros, M. (2017). Dialogue between theories interpreted as research praxeologies: the case of APOS and the ATD. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9734-3
Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of Didactical Situations in Math- ematics.
Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. In Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47211-2
Chevallard, Y. (2019). Introducing The Anthropological Theory of The Didactic: An Attempt at A Principled Approach. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 12, 71–114.
Chevallard, Y., Barquero, B., Bosch, M., & Florensa, I. (2022). Advances in the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic. In Advances in the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76791-4
Dewi, P. S. (2018). Efektivitas Pendekatan Open Ended Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. PRISMA, 7(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v7i1.340
Fulco, M. N. (2022). The Comparison of Japanese Mathematics Education and United States Mathematics Education. 1–44.
Gumanti, G., Maimunah, M., & Roza, Y. (2022). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP Kecamatan Bantan. PRISMA, 11(2), 310. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v11i2.2301
Kilhamn, C., Bråting, K., Helenius, O., & Mason, J. (2022). Variables in early algebra: exploring didactic potentials in programming activities. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01384-0
Mulyono, M. (2011). Teori Apos Dan Implementasinya Dalam Pembelajaran. Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/jmme.v1i1.9924
Septian, A., & Rahayu, S. (2021). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa melalui Pendekatan Problem Posing dengan Edmodo. PRISMA, 10(2), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v10i2.1813
Septian, A., Ramadhanty, C. L., Darhim, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2021). Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Student Interest in Learning using Google Classroom. Prosiding International Conference on Education of Suryakancana, 1(1), 155–161.
Setyaningsih, V. P., & Firmansyah, D. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP Pada Materi Persamaan Garis Lurus. PRISMA, 11(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v11i1.2048
Takeuchi, H., & Shinno, Y. (2020). Comparing the Lower Secondary Textbooks of Japan and England : a Praxeological Analysis of Symmetry and Transformations in Geometry. 791–810.
Widodo, S., & Kartikasari. (2017). Sekolah Dasar dengan Model Creative Problem Solving ( Cps ). Jurnal PRISMA Universitas Suryakancana P, VI(1), 57–65.
Widodo, S., Septianiady, & Rahayu, P. (2020). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Bermuatan Nilai Islam. PRISMA, 9(2), 192–195.
Wijayanti, D., & Winslow, C. (2017). Mathematical practice in textbooks analysis: Praxeological reference models, the case of proportion. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 6(3), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.2017.2078
Zuliyanti, P., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Model Contextual Teaching Learning (CTL) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP. PRISMA, 9(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v9i1.899
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a journal Author, you have rights for a large range of uses of your article, including use by your employing institute or company. These Author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission.
Authors and readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to PRISMA as publisher of the journal.
PRISMA by UNIVERSITAS SURYAKANCANA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://jurnal.unsur.ac.id/prisma.
