ANALYSIS DIFFERENTIATED ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT FOR GRADE 9 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL IN EMANCIPATED CURRICULUM

Authors

  • Kadek Swasty Sukmastiani Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6377-7828
  • Luh Gd Rahayu Budiarta Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali
  • Ida Ayu Made Istri Utami Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35194/jj.v13i1.4599

Abstract

In the implementation of the curriculum, of course, it cannot be separated from assessment activities. Assessment helps teachers to know the ability and understanding of students in receiving material. The government is very aggressive in creating a new curriculum to catch up on what was missed in the previous curriculum. Currently, the government has published the latest curriculum with the name Emancipated Curriculum. This curriculum has several assessments that are similar to the previous curriculum. The assessments in question are diagnostic assessments, formative assessments, and summative assessments. This assessment aims to help develop differentiated assessment in schools and in accordance with the diverse learning styles of students. This research uses the Design and Development or D&D method proposed by Richey and Klein's (2007). There are four stages in product development, namely Analysis, Design, Development, and Evaluation or called ADDE. Data collection was conducted at SMPN 1 Seririt, with 38 respondents divided into 37 students and 1 English teacher. The resulting data were analyzed with mixed methods or a mixture of qualitative and quantitative. The result of this research is a product in the form of an assessment book intended for teachers. This manufacturing process is based on the ADDE method (Analysis, Design, Development, and Evaluation).

Author Biography

Kadek Swasty Sukmastiani, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali

English Department

References

REFRENCES
Adek Cerah Kurnia Azis, & Lubis, S. K. (2023). Asesmen Diagnostik Sebagai Penilaian Pembelajaran Dalam Kurikulum Merdeka Di Sekolah Dasar. Pena Anda: Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 1(2), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.33830/penaanda.v1i2.6202
Amini, R., & Fitria. Y. (2019). The Development of performance assessment based on integrated model on static electrical in elementary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
Andayani, T., & Madani, F. (2023). Peran Penilaian Pembelajaran Dalam Meningkatkan Prestasi Siswa di Pendidikan Dasar. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(2), 924–930. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i2.4402
Arends, R. L. (2008). Learning to Teach.
Dhomiri, A. (2023). Konsep Dasar dan Peranan serta Fungsi Kurikulum dalam Pendidikan. Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 3(1), 118–128.
Fadil, K., Amran, A., & Alfaien, N. . (2023). Peningkatan Kualitas Pendidikan Dasar Melalui Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar dalam Mewujudkan Suistanble Developments Goals. Journal of Elementary Education.
Hendriati, A. (2009). Psikologi Perkembangan: Pendekatan Ekologi Kaitannya dengan Konsep Diri dan Penyesuaian Diri pada Remaja. PT. Refika Aditama.
Kapitariyani Kimpo Ellen, & Lala Bumela Sudimantara. (2023). Examining Emancipated Curriculum Development in Middle Schools: A Case Study. PANYONARA: Journal of English Education, 5(2), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.19105/panyonara.v5i2.8779
Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2023). Latar Belakang Kurikulum Merdeka. Kementrian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset Dan Teknologi.
Mardiana, R., Ramdini, D. S. A., Putri, F. D., Nurdin, M., Zhahra, R. A., Annisa, S. N., & Setianingsih, Y. (2021). Developing Online Assessment for Junior High School Students Using Proprofs During the Covid19 Pandemic. Jurnal Fascho: Kajian Pendidikan Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 11(1), 1–09. https://doi.org/10.54626/fascho.v11i1.77
Muhammad, M., & Kusno. (2013). Analisis Diagnostik Kesulitan Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Model Linier. Encephale, 53(1), 59–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2012.03.001
Naf’iah, J., Faruq, D. J., & Mutmainah, S. (2023). Karakteristik Pembelajaran Pada Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., Mi, 5–24.
Nasution. (2011). Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar & Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Neil, F. (1987). VARK: Guide To Learning Styles.
Nisrokha. (2018). Authentic Assessment (Penilaian Otentik). Jurnal Madaniyah, 8(2), 209–229.
Nurkancana, & Sunartana. (1992). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. CV. Maulana.
Putri, S., Asbari, A., & Hapizi, M. . (2023). Perkembangan Pendidikan Indonesia: Evaluasi Potensi Implementasi Merdeka Belajar. Journal of Information Systems and Management.
Sueni, N. M. (2019). Metode, Model dan Bentuk Model Pembelajaran. Wacana Saraswati, 19(2), 1–16. https://jurnal.ikipsaraswati.ac.id/index.php/wacanasaraswati/article/view/35
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D.
Suprijono. (2013). Cooperative Learning Teori dan Aplikasi Paikem.
Susanti, M., Rahmadona, T., & Fitria, Y. (2023). Studi Literatur: Perbedaan Penilaian Kurikulum 2013 dengan Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Basicedu, 7(1), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i1.4444
Tomlinsom. (2003). Strategies and tools for responsive teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Yusri, R., Muspardi, M., Kemal, E., & Rahmat, W. (2019). Effectiveness of national qualification framework Indonesia based curriculum and higher education national standard behaviour assesment rubric. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042129

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-03-25

Issue

Section

Articles