UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF DIFFICULTIES ON CONVEYING THE ARGUMENT IN ONLINE DISCUSSION DURING THE PANDEMIC COVID 19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35194/jj.v10i1.1940Abstract
During the 2019 corona pandemic, Indonesia itself decided to conduct online learning, both at schools and universities. Students are required to carry out the virtual learning process in their respective homes. One of the ways in which online classes take place is to conduct online discussions between students. Therefore in this study, the researchers conducted research with the aim of finding out what difficulties students faced in presenting their arguments in online discussions during this corona pandemic. Researchers used qualitative methods through online surveys by giving several questions to correspondents in the form of questionnaires using google form. There are 34 students who are willing to be correspondents in our research this time. The reseachers produce so many surprising facts that have been experienced by students when online discussions take place. Some students did experience difficulties in delivering arguments in online discussion sessions ranging from not being confident and also lack of knowledge in building arguments. There is a lot that needs to be evaluated about the way lecturers make this online discussion in order that students are better prepared to convey their arguments in online discussion.References
Choi, J. J., Robb, C. A., Mifli, M., & Zainuddin, Z. (2021). University students’ perception to online class delivery methods during the COVID-19 pandemic: A focus on hospitality education in Korea and Malaysia. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 29(August), 100336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100336
Hazaymeh, W. A. (2021). EFL students’ perceptions of online distance learning for enhancing English language learning during Covid-19 Pandemic. In International Journal of Instruction (Vol. 14, Issue 3, pp. 501–518). https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14329a
Kurnaz, F. B., Ergün, E., & Ilgaz, H. (2018). Participation in online discussion environments: Is it really effective? Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 1719–1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9688-4
Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.04.001
Liu, E. Z. F., Cheng, S. S., & Lin, C. H. (2013). The Effects of Using Online Q&A Discussion Forums with Different Characteristics as a Learning Resource. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 667–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0072-2
Muthuprasad, T., Aiswarya, S., Aditya, K. S., & Jha, G. K. (2021). Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID -19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101
Peimani, N., & Kamalipour, H. (2021). Online education in the post covid-19 era: Students’ perception and learning experience. Education Sciences, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100633
Rojabi, A. R. (2020). Exploring EFL Students’ Perception of Online Learning via Microsoft Teams: University Level in Indonesia. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i2.2349
Xie, K., Yu, C., & Bradshaw, A. C. (2014). Impacts of role assignment and participation in asynchronous discussions in college-level online classes. Internet and Higher Education, 20, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.003
Yanni, M. L., Munzil, M., & Sumari, S. (2021). Developing multiple representation’s teaching materials assisted by blended learning to improve student’s science process skills. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043275
Published
Issue
Section
License
I. Transfer of copyright
By execution of the present Statement Author transfers copyright and assigns exclusively to Publisher all rights, title and interest that Author may have (for the extent transferable) in and to the Article and any revisions or versions, but not limited to the sole right to print, publish and sell the Article worldwide in all languages and media. Transfer of the above rights is referred to as those of the final and published version of the Article but does not restrict Author to self-archive the preprint version of his/her paper.
II. Rights and obligations of Publisher
The Publisher rights to the Article shall especially include, but shall not be limited to:
Ability to publish an electronic version of the Article via the website
Distribution provided by or through joepallt from time to time, selling the Article world-wide (through subscriptions, Pay-per-View, single archive sale, etc.)
Publishing the Article in the printed Journals as listed on the official Website of Publisher
Transferring the copyright and the right of use of the Article.
Taking measures on behalf of the Author against infringement, inappropriate use of the Article, libel or plagiarism.
Publisher agrees to send the text of the Article to the e-mail address of Author indicated in the present Statement for preview before the first publishing either in paper and/or electronic format (Proof). Author shall return the corrected text of the Article within 1 week to the Publisher.
III. Rights and obligations of Author
The Author declares and warrants that he/she is the exclusive author of the Article or has the right to represent all co-authors of the and has not granted any exclusive or non-exclusive right to the Article to any third party prior to the execution of the present Statement and has the right therefore to enter into the present Statement and entitle the Publisher the use of the Article subject to the present Statement.
By executing the present Statement Author confirms that the Article is free of plagiarism, and that Author has exercised reasonable care to ensure that it is accurate and, to the best of Author's knowledge, does not contain anything which is libelous, or obscene, or infringes on anyone copyright, right of privacy, or other rights.
The preprint version is the Authors' manuscript or the galley proof or the Authors' manuscript along with the corrections made in the course of the peer review process. The Authors' right to self-archive is irrespective of the format of the preprint (.doc, .tex., .pdf) version and self-archiving includes the free circulation of this file via e-mail or publication of this preprint on the Authors' webpage or on the Authors' institutional repository with open or restricted access.
For any disputes arising from or in connection with the present Statement Parties agree in the exclusive competence of joepallt's publisher
Date and place of signature