REMODELING BENSON’S LEARNER AUTONOMY FRAMEWORK: A LIBRARY-BASED STUDY

Authors

  • Christina Atika Yulina Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35194/jj.v13i2.5649

Abstract

Early theorists like Holec (1981) defined autonomy as the ability to take charge of one's own learning, while later scholars such as Little (1991) expanded this concept by adding essential psychological dimension, which covers two key dimensions of autonomy: control over learning management and control over cognitive process which is underlied by psychology of learning. Benson (2013) then added situational aspect of control over learning content and formulated this concept into a three-dimensional model in which learner control can be exercised: learning management (underlied by learning behavior), cognitive processes (underlied by psychology of learning) and learning content (underlied by learning situation). Despite these developments, the visual and conceptual representations of autonomy appear fragmented and may not sufficiently illustrate the interconnections among its dimensions, lacking a visual explanation of how they dynamically interact in autonomous learning and leaving room for a clearer, more integrated framework that helps educators and learners alike understand the interdependence of autonomy's dimensions. This study, conducted as a library-based analysis, critically reviews existing theoretical models and proposes a remodeled framework to address these conceptual gaps. The primary purpose of this paper is to remodel Benson’s framework of control in learning autonomy, without attempting to integrate other theoretical perspectives such as Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) or Self-Directed Learning, nor does it propose new theoretical dimensions beyond Benson’s three control areas.

References

Azhar, A., & Abdullah, A. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Language Learning Autonomy (LLA): A Systematic Literature Review Uncovering Learning Autonomy. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(6).
Basilan, M. L., & Berber, L. V. (2024). Learner Autonomy as an Instructional Strategy in Enhancing Language Learning. International Education Forum, 2(4). doi:10.26689/ief.v2i4.7050
Benson, P. (2008). Teachers’ and learners’ perspectives on autonomy (pp. 15–32). https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.1.05ben
Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and Researching Autonomy (C. N. Candlin & D. R. Hall (eds.); 2nd ed.). Routledge.
Benson, P., & Voller, P. (2013). Autonomy and independence in language learning. In Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315842172
Little, D. (1991). Learner Autonomy 1: Definition, Issues and Problems. In The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teaching. Authentik Language Learning Resources Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676203-29
Little, D. (1995). Learning as Dialogue: The Dependence of Learner Autonomy on Teacher Autonomy. 23(2), 175–181.
Little, D. (1996). Learner Autonomy: Some Steps in the Evolution of Theory and Practice. Die Neueren Sprachen, 93(5), 430–42.
Mynard, J. (2024). Language Learner Autonomy. Reference Module in Social Sciences. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95504-1.00160-5
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. In Cambridge Applied Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139524490
Oxford, R. L. (2003). Toward a more systematic model of second language learner autonomy. Learner Autonomy Across Cultures: Language Education Perspectives, 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1057/97802305046845
Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631–649). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50048-2
Wenden, A. (1983). Literature Review: the Process of Intervention. Language Learning, 33(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00988.x
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Downloads

Published

2025-07-29

Issue

Section

Articles