CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF THE SHORT FICTION “MAGIC” BASED ON NORMAN FAIRCLOUGH’S APPROACH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35194/jj.v9i2.1758Abstract
In the discussion about social injustice, inequality becomes a core issue. It is proven by inequality themed short stories which are still relevant nowadays although they were written decades ago. In this paper we analyse the 1928’s short story Magic written by Katherine Anne Porter under Fairclough's (1922) critical discourse analysis. It aims at finding social wrong—especially inequality issues in the short story and finding possible ways to solve the social wrong.
The analysis will be done in the framework of Fairclough’s critical discourse methods which divides the discourse into three dimensions, i.e. linguistic description of the language text, interpretation of the relationship between the discursive processes and the text, and explanation of the relationship between the discursive processes and social processes (Fairclough, 1995). To describe the linguistic aspect of the text, appraisal theory is used as the approach to support the process of analyzing the linguistic elements that create the discourse. Thus, the analysis will link the linguistic and social contexts of the discourse. The results show that there are some social wrongs happen in the story. It is also shown through judgement, affect, and appreciation.
References
Darma, Yoce Aliah. (2009). Analisis Wacana Kritis. Bandung: Yrama Widya.
Fairclough, Norman. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, Norman. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London & New York: Longman.
Fairclough, Norman. (2000). Critical Analysis of Media Discourse. In Paul Marris and Sue Thornham (peny.). Media Studies A.
Fairclough, Norman. (2001). Critical Discourse Analysis. Int. Adv. Eng. Technol. 7. 452-487.
Fairclough, Norman. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Haryatmoko. (2017). Critical discourse analysis. Depok: Rajawali Pers.
Hosseini, A., & Sattari, E. (2018). A Review Of Naguib Mahfouz’s ‘The Beggar’ Based On Norman Fairclough's Critical Discourse Analysis. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 525-541.
Johnstone, Barbara. (2007). Discourse Analysis 2nd Edition (Introducing Linguistics). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Kendenan, Esriaty S. & Sumarlam. (2018). Gender ideology in seno gumira ajidarma’s clara: A critical discourse analysis. Advances in social science, education and humanities research. Volume 280.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: The Appraisal Framework. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 256.
Mayuuf, Hussain & So'ad, Khudhair. (2020). A Critical discourse stylistic analysis of discrimination with supply chain practices in English children short stories. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change I,10. 774.
Porter, Katherine Anne. (1928). The story of an hour. Retrieved from shortstoryproject.com/story/magic/
Rashidi, N., Khormaei, A., & Zarei, M. (2014). The critical discourse analysis of the representation of women and men in Bozorg Alavi’s short stories. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(3). https://doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.3p.126
Smith. Mary St. Peter. (1959). Symbolism in the Short Stories of Katherine Anne Porter (Master’s Thesis). Loyola University Chicago: Chicago.
White, Peter R.R. (2015). The language of attitude, arguability, and interpersonal positioning: The appraisal website. http://www.languageofevaluation.info/appraisal/index.html. Retrieved on Dec 1, 2019.
Winters, Stacey L. (1993). Sister or Rival: Relationships Between Women in the Short FIction of Katherine Anne Porter (Master’s Thesis). Oklahoma State University: Oklahoma.
Zinnivand, T., & Soulati, S. (2020). Critical discourse analysis of the short story "Thrigh Alkhlas" based on Norman Fairclough's approach. The Quarterly Journal of LesÄn-E Mobeen (Research in Arabic Literature). 11(38)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I. Transfer of copyright
By execution of the present Statement Author transfers copyright and assigns exclusively to Publisher all rights, title and interest that Author may have (for the extent transferable) in and to the Article and any revisions or versions, but not limited to the sole right to print, publish and sell the Article worldwide in all languages and media. Transfer of the above rights is referred to as those of the final and published version of the Article but does not restrict Author to self-archive the preprint version of his/her paper.
II. Rights and obligations of Publisher
The Publisher rights to the Article shall especially include, but shall not be limited to:
Ability to publish an electronic version of the Article via the website
Distribution provided by or through joepallt from time to time, selling the Article world-wide (through subscriptions, Pay-per-View, single archive sale, etc.)
Publishing the Article in the printed Journals as listed on the official Website of Publisher
Transferring the copyright and the right of use of the Article.
Taking measures on behalf of the Author against infringement, inappropriate use of the Article, libel or plagiarism.
Publisher agrees to send the text of the Article to the e-mail address of Author indicated in the present Statement for preview before the first publishing either in paper and/or electronic format (Proof). Author shall return the corrected text of the Article within 1 week to the Publisher.
III. Rights and obligations of Author
The Author declares and warrants that he/she is the exclusive author of the Article or has the right to represent all co-authors of the and has not granted any exclusive or non-exclusive right to the Article to any third party prior to the execution of the present Statement and has the right therefore to enter into the present Statement and entitle the Publisher the use of the Article subject to the present Statement.
By executing the present Statement Author confirms that the Article is free of plagiarism, and that Author has exercised reasonable care to ensure that it is accurate and, to the best of Author's knowledge, does not contain anything which is libelous, or obscene, or infringes on anyone copyright, right of privacy, or other rights.
The preprint version is the Authors' manuscript or the galley proof or the Authors' manuscript along with the corrections made in the course of the peer review process. The Authors' right to self-archive is irrespective of the format of the preprint (.doc, .tex., .pdf) version and self-archiving includes the free circulation of this file via e-mail or publication of this preprint on the Authors' webpage or on the Authors' institutional repository with open or restricted access.
For any disputes arising from or in connection with the present Statement Parties agree in the exclusive competence of joepallt's publisher
Date and place of signature