Tindak Tutur Siaran Kompas TV dengan label “Anggota DPR RI Anita Jacoba Gah Gebrak Meja Minta KPK Periksa Nadiem”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35194/jd.v8i2.4465Keywords:
pragmatik, lokusi, ilokusi, perlokusiAbstract
This article will describe the speech acts of a Kompas TV broadcast titled "Indonesian House of Representatives Member Anita Jacoba Doesn't Strike Back, Asking the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) to Investigate Nadiem" as a pragmatic study. The research method used is descriptive qualitative. The data in this study consist of speech acts in the form of locutions, illocutions, and perlocutions. The data source in this study is a video. The data collection techniques used in this study were listening and note-taking. The data analysis techniques used in this study were data reduction, data presentation, and conclusions. The results of this study indicate that the speech acts contained in the text include locutions, illocutions, and perlocutions. Locutions themselves include declarative locutions, imperative locutions, and interrogative locutions. Illocutions consist of actives, directives, and expressives, while perlocutions are divided into directive perlocutions, expressive perlocutions, representative perlocutions, and commissive perlocutions. Keywords: illocution; locution; perlocution; pragmatics ABSTRAK Artikel ini akan mendeskripsikan tindak tutur siaran kompas tv berlabel “Anggota DPR RI Anita Jacoba Gah Gebrak Minta KPK Periksa Nadiem” sebagai sebuah kajian pragmatik. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu deskriptif kualitatif. Data dalam penelitian ini berupa tindak tutur berupa lokusi, ilokusi, dan perlokusi. Sumber data dalam penelitian ini berupa video. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan pada penelitian ini yaitu teknik simak dan teknik catat. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu reduksi data, penyajian data, dan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa tindak tutur yang terdapat dalam teks meliputi; lokusi, ilokusi, dan perlokusi. Lokusi sendiri meliputi; lokusi pernyataan (deklaratif), lokusi perintah (imperatif), dan lokusi pertanyaan (interogatif). Ilokusi terdiri dari; asetif, direktif, dan ekspresif, sedangkan perlokusi terbagi menjadi; perlokusi direktif, perlokusi ekspresif, perlokusi representatif, dan perlokusi komisif. Kata Kunci: ilokusi; lokusi; perlokusi; pragmatikReferences
AFTAR PUSTAKA
Austin, J. L. (1962). Speech Acts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Djajasudarma, D. (1993). Semantik 2: Pemahaman Ilmu Makna. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Djajasudarma, D. (2002). Analisis Semantik Laksal Verba (1) Ruang di dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Djajasudarma, D. (2017). Wacana dan Pragmatik. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Firth, J. R. (1935). The Technique Of Semantics. Transactions Of The Philological Society, 34(1), 36–73.
Insani, E. N. (2016). Tindak Tutur Perlokusi Guru dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kelas XI SMK Negeri 1 Sawit Boyolali. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Kempson, R. M. (1977). Semantic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Routledge.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, D. (1965). Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Morris, C. W. (1938). Foundations of the Theory of Signs. In International Encyclopedia of Unified Science (hal. 1–59). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Palmer, F. R. (1981). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Safitri, R. D., & Mulyani, M. (2021). Teori Tindak Tutur dalam Studi Pragmatik. KABASTRA: Kajian Bahasa dan Sastra, 1(1), 59–67.
Searle, J. R. (1969). How To Derive ‘Ought’from ‘Is. In The Is-ought Question: A Collection Of Papers On The Central Problem In Moral Philosophy (hal. 120–134). London: Springer.
Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect Speech Acts. In Speech Acts (hal. 59–82). London: Springer.
Tarigan, H. G. (1986). Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Tarigan, H. G. (2008). Menulis Sebagai Sesuatu Keterampilan Bahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Context And Cognition: Knowledge Frames And Speech Act Comprehension. Journal of pragmatics, 1(3), 211–231.
Wijana, I. (1995). Wacana Kartun Dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Austin, J. L. (1962). Speech Acts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Djajasudarma, D. (1993). Semantik 2: Pemahaman Ilmu Makna. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Djajasudarma, D. (2002). Analisis Semantik Laksal Verba (1) Ruang di dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Djajasudarma, D. (2017). Wacana dan Pragmatik. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Firth, J. R. (1935). The Technique Of Semantics. Transactions Of The Philological Society, 34(1), 36–73.
Insani, E. N. (2016). Tindak Tutur Perlokusi Guru dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kelas XI SMK Negeri 1 Sawit Boyolali. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Kempson, R. M. (1977). Semantic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Routledge.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, D. (1965). Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Morris, C. W. (1938). Foundations of the Theory of Signs. In International Encyclopedia of Unified Science (hal. 1–59). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Palmer, F. R. (1981). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Safitri, R. D., & Mulyani, M. (2021). Teori Tindak Tutur dalam Studi Pragmatik. KABASTRA: Kajian Bahasa dan Sastra, 1(1), 59–67.
Searle, J. R. (1969). How To Derive ‘Ought’from ‘Is. In The Is-ought Question: A Collection Of Papers On The Central Problem In Moral Philosophy (hal. 120–134). London: Springer.
Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect Speech Acts. In Speech Acts (hal. 59–82). London: Springer.
Tarigan, H. G. (1986). Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Tarigan, H. G. (2008). Menulis Sebagai Sesuatu Keterampilan Bahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Context And Cognition: Knowledge Frames And Speech Act Comprehension. Journal of pragmatics, 1(3), 211–231.
Wijana, I. (1995). Wacana Kartun Dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
2025-08-01
Issue
Section
Articles
License
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
