EFFECT OF CONCENTRATED OWNERSHIP ON AUDIT FEE STICKINESS: THE MODERATING ROLE OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD
Keywords:
Concentrated Ownership, Audit Fee Stickiness, Financial Statement FraudAbstract
This study aims to examine the effect of concentrated ownership on audit fee stickiness with financial statement fraud as a moderating variable. The study employed a verification method with a quantitative approach. Data were collected using purposive sampling based on predetermined criteria, resulting in a sample of 50 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2019–2023 period. With a five-year observation period, a total of 250 firm-year observations were obtained. Hypothesis testing was conducted using multiple regression analysis and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). The results indicate that concentrated ownership has a positive and significant effect on audit fee stickiness. Furthermore, financial statement fraud significantly and positively moderates the relationship between concentrated ownership and audit fee stickiness. These findings suggest that a higher level of concentrated ownership increases the likelihood of audit fee stickiness, and this effect becomes stronger in companies that are indicated to engage in financial statement fraud. This study contributes to the development of literature on audit fee stickiness and provides insights for future research. Future studies are recommended to apply alternative measurements for the variables and incorporate additional factors that may influence audit fee stickiness in order to obtain more comprehensive results.
References
Afdhalastin, Aulia Dewi, and Etna Nur Afri Yuyetta. 2021. “Analisis Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Terkonsentrasi, Kompleksitas, Profitabilitas, Dan Risiko Perusahaan Terhadap Audit Fee.” Jurnal Of Accounting Vol.10(4): 1–15.
Amin, Aminul. 2016. “Independensi Komite Audit , Kualitas Audit Dan Kualitas Laba: Bukti Empiris Perusahaan Dengan Kepemilikan Terkonsentrasi.” Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan 18(1): 1–14.
Amin, Nur Fadilah, Sabaruddin Garancang, and Kamaluddin Abunawas. 2023. “Konsep Umum Populasi Dan Sampel Dalam Penelitian.” Jurnal Pilar 14(1): 15–31.
Aziz, Abdul. 2014. “Analisis Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance (Gcg) Terhadap Kualitas Pengungkapan Sustainability Report.” Jurnal Audit dan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi (JAAKFE) 3(2): 65–84. Bloom, Nicholas, and John Van Reenen. 2013. “Nber Working Papers: 89.
Chang, X., et al. (2019). Determinants of audit fees and audit fee stickiness.
Chen, C. Y., Su, X., & Wu, X. (2007). Market competition, audit fees, and audit quality. Contemporary Accounting Research.
Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation. Contemporary Accounting Research.
Ghosh, A., & Lustgarten, S. (2006). Pricing of initial audit engagements by large and small audit firms. Contemporary Accounting Research.
IAPI. (2017). Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik (SPAP). Ikatan Akuntan Publik Indonesia.
IAPI. (2017). Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik (SPAP). Ikatan Akuntan Publik Indonesia.
Rahman. (2019). Fraud financial reporting and corporate governance.
Sekar. (2010). Audit fee stickiness and ownership structure.
Setiawan, & Hadiwidjojo. (2020). Ownership concentration and audit fees.
Skousen, C. J., & Wright, C. (2009). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud.
Taman, A. (2010). Ownership concentration and corporate governance.
Widarjono, A. (2013). Ekonometrika: Pengantar dan aplikasinya. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dwi Nadika Suhendar Dwi Nadika Suhendar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


