SISTEM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI BAGI LEMBAGA PERBANKAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 10 TAHUN 1998 TENTANG PERUBAHAN ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 7 TAHUN 1992 TENTANG PERBANKAN

Kristian Kristian, Alvin Sebastian Kurnia

Abstract


In order to make development in the field of economics to support and keep continuity of the implementation of national development that increase of the development and the result evenly, to raise of economic growth and to keep the stability of national development, to raise standard of living peoples (increase of prosperity of people), to create atmosphere of Indonesian that is fair and prosperous and create social fairness for all Indonesian, government need to form financial institution which is bank. Bank is seen as an institution that can obtain those goals because the bank’s role as intermediation institution or act as financial intermediary as well as act as “agent of developmentâ€. The existence of bank as a corporate itself hold role more in the living of modern society.  However, the existence of bank its self should be wary because the bank not always gives the positive effect forever. In short, the existence of the bank can also give the negative effect, which is bank as a criminal and the bank can do the crime itself, including the following: telemarketing fraud, client fraud, grind and embezzlement customer’s funds or debtor, various form of crime in the field of credit, make engineering report, make false record or make double accounting to save the reputation itself, abuse of authority, etc. the bank crime is one of form white collar crime, an organized crime that is systemic and extraordinary crimes, and new dimension of crime. This crime can occur because of the involvement of the business actors themselves, both from the bottom to the board of directors and even shareholders of the bank. As a law state, protection of people (in the framework of the welfare of the society) shall be done in every aspect. This protection shall be made against certain irresponsible acts, one of which is protection against the prevalence of "banking crime". In that context, considering the functional institution of bank is so important and prevalence of banking crimes that occur raises a question for authors, is it possible that corporate criminal liability systems are applied to banks? On that basis, this paper will discuss the implementation of corporate criminal liability system for banking institutions according to Indonesia law act number 10 of 1998 on Amendment to Act of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 1992 concerning Banking. This research uses normative judicial research method by researching library materials.  On this basis, this paper will discuss the implementation of corporate criminal liability system for banking institutions according to the Law of the Republic of Indonesia act Number 10 of 1998 on Amendment to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 1992 Concerning Banking. This research uses normative juridical research method by researching library materials. The data used are secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The analysis method used in this study to conduct the method of content analysis (content analysis). The research result shows that the politics of law in the current banking law has not acknowledged the corporation (in this case is the bank) as the subject of the crime. The reason is because the system of criminal responsibility in the law is still charged to the caretaker (the man itself) as a subject of criminal. Thus, the current banking law still holds the principle of “societas delinquere non potest†or principle of “universitas delinquere non potestâ€. To minimize the problems that related to the rampant banking crime and law enforcement in the banking sector, the current banking law needs to be reorientation, and reformulated by regulating corporations (banking institutions) and other corporations as subjects of crime. The results also show that the regulation of corporate criminal liability system for banking institutions gets legitimacy or justification philosophically, theoretically and sociologically. Therefore, it becomes a necessary and urgent need to revise immediately the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 10 of 1998 on Amendment to Act of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 1992 concerning Banking (especially in regard to criminal provisions.

Keywords: Criminal Liability, Corporate Crime, Bank, and Banking Act.


Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Buku

A.Z. Abidin, 1983, Bunga Rampai Hukum PIdana, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta.

Djony Edward, 2010, BLBI Extraordinary Crime–Satu Analisis Historis dan Kebijakan, LKIS, Yogyakarta.

Edi Setiadi dan Rena Yulia, 2010, Hukum Pidana Ekonomi, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.

Johannes Ibrahim dan Yohanes Hermanto Sirait, 2018, Kejahatan Transfer Dana (Evolusi Dan Modus Kejahatan Melalui Sarana Lembaga Keuangan Bank), PT. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Kristian & Yopi Gunawan, 2013, Tindak Pidana Perbankan, CV. Nuansa Aulia, Bandung.

Kristian & Yopi Gunawan, 2018, Tindak Pidana Perbankan Dalam Proses Peradilan Di Indonesia, PT. Prenada Media Goup, Jakarta.

Kristian, 2017, Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Ditinjau Dari Berbagai Konvensi Internasional, PT. Refika Aditama.

Machteld Boot, 2001, Nullum Crimen Sine Lege and the Subject Matter Jurisdiction of The International Criminal Court: Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes, Intersentia, Antwerpen – Oxford – New York.

Marwan Effendy, 2012, Tipologi Kejahatan Perbankan Dari Perspektif Hukum Pidana, Referensi.

Muladi dan Dwidja Priyatno, 1991, Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Hukum Pidana, STHB, Bandung.

Muladi dan Dwidja Priyatno, 2010, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Kencana Media Group, Jakarta.

Setiyono, 2013, Teori-Teori & Alur Pikir Penerapan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Banyumedia Publishing, Malang.

Sutan Remi Sjahdeini, 2006, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Grafiti Pers, Jakarta.

B. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

UU RI Nomor 8 Tahun 1981, Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 tahun 2011 Tentang Akutunan Publik

Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana dan Penjelasannya.

C. Jurnal

Dedi Mulyadi dan M. Rendi Aridhayandi, 2015, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Tentang Pemilu Serentak Dihubungkan Dengan Pencegahan Korupsi Politik, Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, Vol. I No. 02 Edisi Juli Desember, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Suryakancana, Cianjur.

Kholis, Azizul, I Nengah Rata, Sri Sulistiyowati, dan Endah Prapti Lestari. 2001, Kewajiban hukum (legal liability) Auditor, Jurnal Bisinis dan Akuntansi, Volume 3, Nomor 3 Desember.

M. Rendi Aridhayandi, 2017, Kajian tentang Penerapan Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku yang Melakukan Perbuatan Curang dalam Bisnis Dihubungkan dengan Pasal 379a Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Investasi, Volume 8 Nomor 2, April, Fakultas Hukum Kristen Maranatha, Bandung.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v4i2.838

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia INDEXED BY :

/