PENGUATAN INSTRUMEN PERLINDUNGAN HAM DALAM PEMBAHARUAN KUHAP UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN CITA NEGARA HUKUM
Abstract
According to the 1945 Constitution, Indonesia is a state of law. Law violation must be prosecuted according to the rules of applicable law. Violation of criminal law, its enforcement through criminal procedural procedures. Criminal Procedure Code needs to be updated because of its many weaknesses. Criminal Procedure Code reform must guarantee the achievement of the ideals of a rule of law state. This study aims to reveal a model for strengthening human rights protection instruments in the reform of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is a normative study using secondary data, in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary materials. Data collection techniques with library research. The analysis was carried out prescriptively with the deduction method. The results show that in the reform of the Criminal Procedure Code the instrument for protecting human rights is strengthened because Indonesia has ratified several international conventions, including the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The Criminal Procedure Code must comply with several ICCPR provisions, including regarding detention by investigators as short as possible and immediately brought before the judge, stipulating the right to remain silent as an embodiment of the principle of non-self-incrimination.
Â
Keywords: Criminal Procedure Code Reform, Human Rights Protection, Rule of Law.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A. Buku.
Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, (2008).
A. Zainal Abidin Farid, Hukum Pidana I. cet. 1 Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, (1995).
Baharuddin Lopa, Permasalahan Pembinaan dan Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia Jakarta, PT Bulan Bintang, (1987).
Barda Nawawi Arief, Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Jakarta, Kencana Prenadamedia Group, (2014).
Jawahir Thontowi, Hukum Inklusif (Perspektif Indonesia), Yogyakarta, Penerbit Kreasi Total Media, (2019).
Herlambang P Wiratraman, Penegakan Hukum dan Penghormatan Hak Asasi Manusia. Buku Bunga Rampai Memperkuat Peradaban Hukum dan Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Jakarta, Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial RI, 2019).
M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Jilid I, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, (2014).
Muhammad Siddiq Tgk, Perkembangan Pemikiran Teori Hukum, Jakarta, PT Pradnya Paramita, (2009).
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mahmudji, Penelitian Hukum normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta, RajaGrafindo Persada, (2003).
T Azhary, Negara Hukum Indonesia, Analisis Yuridis Normatif tentang Unsur-Unsurnya, Jakarta, UI Press, (1995).
B. Perundang-Undangan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).
Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.
C. Jurnal.
Barbara Ann Hocking and Laura Leigh Manville, What of the Right to Silence Still Supporting the Presumption of Innoncence or a Growing Legal Fiction, Macquarie Law Journal, Vol 1. No 1. (2001).
Barda Nawawi Arief, “Pembangunan Sistem Hukum Nasional Indonesia, Kuliah Umum pada Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana UBH Padang, 16 Mei 2, (2009).
Chrisje Brants & Stijn Franken, The Protection of Fundamental Human Rights in Criminal Process General Report, Utrecht Law Review, Volume 5, Issue 2 (October), (2009).
Eko Hidayat, Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia, Jurnal Asas, Vol. 8, No. 2, Juni, (2016).
Eni Nurbaningrum, Rule of Law dan Perkembangannya dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia, Makalah Diskusi “Rule of Law in Indonesiaâ€, diselenggarakan oleh World Justice Project, (2014).
Isidore Kwadwo Tufuor, Due process or crime control? An examination of the limits to the right to silence in criminal proceedings in Ghana, African Human Rights Law Journal, Volume 22, No. 1, (2022).
Jan S Maringka, Kewenangan Kejaksaan sebagai Dominus Litis Menyongsong Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana, Jurnal Peradilan Indonesia Vol. 3, Juli – Desember, (2015).
J.A. Raja Kenasihen Ginting, Masalah Dikhotomi Penyidikan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia, Era Hukum No. 2/TH. 6 /Oktober, (1999).
Jerome Hall, Objectives of Federal Criminal Procedural Revision, The Yale Law Journal, [Vol. 51 : 723. (1942).
Luhut M.P Pangaribuan, Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan dalam (HPP) dalam Rancangan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia, Media Hukum dan Keadilan, Teropong, Volume 1 - Agustus PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM ACARA PIDANA, Diterbitkan Masyarakat Pemantau Peradilan Indonesia (Mappi) FH UI, (2014).
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Gagasan Negara Hukum Indonesia, Majalah Hukum Nasional, Volume : No. 1, (2012).
Justin Fong, Bringing Guns to a Gun Fight: Why the Adversarial System Is Best Served By a Policy Compeling Attorney to Ethically Mine for Metadata, Washington University Jurisprudence Review Vol. 7:107, (2014).
Kafayat Motilewa Quadr, et all Adquisitorial: The Mixing of Two Legal Systems, International Journal of Humanities and Management Sciences (IJHMS), Volume 3, Issue 1, (2015).
Marco Fabri, Criminal Procedure And Public Prosecution Reform In Italy: A Flash Back, International Journal For Court Administration, January, (2008).
Mary Ann Glendon, (2004), The Rule of Law in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, North Western Journal of International Human Rights, Spring, Volume 2 Issue 1, article 3.
M. Zen Abdullah, Urgensi Perlunya Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana Nasional di Indonesia yang Lebih Responsif, Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, (2020).
Melissa Clack, Caught Between Hope and Despair : An Analysis of the Japanese Criminal Justice System, Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, Volume 31, Number 4 April Fall, Article 2, (2020).
Michael D. Cicchini, The New Miranda Warning, SMU LAW REVIEW, Volume 65, Issue 4. Article 12, (2012).
Miko Ginting, Evaluasi terhadap Pembahasan RKUHAP : Mengapa Pemerintah dan DPR Tidak Berhasil Membahas RKUHAP?, Jurnal Peradilan Indonesia Vol. 3, Juli-Desember, (2015).
Randall Peerenboom, Human Rights and Rule of Law : What’s the Relationship?. University of California, Los Angeles School of Law Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Research Paper No. 05-31, (2005).
Robert Stein, Rule of Law: What Does It Mean? Minnesota Journal of International Law, [Vol. 18:2, (2009).
Robert Strang, More Adversarial, but not Completely Adversarial : Reformation of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code, Fordham International Law Journal, Volume 32, Issue 1, (2008).
Vanessa A Edkins & Kenneth D Royal, Evaluating the Due Process and Crime Control Perspectives Using Rasch Measurement Analysis, Journal of Multi Disciplinary Evaluation, Volume 7, Number 16 ISSN 1556-8180 July, (2011).
Volker F Krey, Speech: Characteristic Features of German Criminal Proceedings—An Alternativeto the Criminal Procedure Law of the United States?, Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, Volume 21, Number 4, Article 2, (1999).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v9i1.3337
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia INDEXED BY :
