THE CONFORMITY BETWEEN LAW NO. 1 OF 2021 AND LAW NO. 30 OF 1999 IN THE RESOLUTION OF ECONOMIC DISPUTES BETWEEN INDONESIA AND EFTA COUNTRIES

A. Dardiri Hasyim, Darsinah Darsinah

Abstract


Law No. 1 of 2021 mentions that there are basic materials stipulated in the IE-CEPA Agreement, among others, dispute resolution. This paper aims to explain the implementation of economic dispute resolution in the approval of a comprehensive economic partnership between Indonesia and EFTA countries perspective of the Arbitration Law. This research uses a library approach, where the data collection technique uses literature and document studies. Meanwhile, the data analysis used is a triangulation technique. The results showed that the approval of a comprehensive economic partnership between Indonesia and the EFTA country as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 2021 does not clash with Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration. This is because there is an accompanying Arbitration Event Law, especially concerning the selection of arbitration panels. In all, there are 8 (eight) perspectives that show the similarity of the two Laws, namely: Written application in choosing dispute resolution through Arbitration; Conciliation and Mediation; Selection of arbitrators; Examination by the Arbitrator; Language of Arbitration; Determination is final and binding; Peaceful efforts; And not willing a person to be elected as an arbitrator.

Keywords: Arbitration, Disputes, EFTA.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anghel, A. R., & Ciobanu, C. (2018). Aspects regarding the evolution of the transport of containerized goods through the port of Constanta in the context of European containerized trade. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 172(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/172/1/012020

Aporevich, V. N. (2019). On the Competence of Russian Arbitration Courts in Cases Involving Foreign Persons. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 272(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/272/3/032188

Aritonang, D. D., & Simanjuntak, M. R. A. (2020). Analysis of important factors in choosing or using process alternative dispute resolution of a construction project from contractor's perspective (case study in XYZ Company, Ltd's). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1007(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1007/1/012084

Broad, M. (2021). Deepening Ties but Unfulfilled Hopes: The EFTA Dimension of Western Europe's Relations with Tito's Yugoslavia. International History Review, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2021.1958361

By, E. D., & Albraith, J. E. A. N. G. (2020). U.S. Supreme Court Holds that the New York Convention Does Not Displace Domestic Doctrines Permitting Nonsignatories to Enforce Arbitration Agreements. American Journal of International Law, 114(4), 757–761. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2020.78

Chan, D. S. W. (2020). China's diplomatic strategies in response to economic disputes in Myanmar. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 20(2), 307–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcy026

Dent, C. M. (2010). Free trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific a decade on Evaluating the past, looking to the future. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 10(2), 201–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcp022

Hayati, K., Latief, Y., & Santos, A. J. (2019). Development of construction dispute resolution process through Arbitration (Indonesian National Board of Arbitration (BANI). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 674(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/674/1/012028

Hidayah, K. (2018). Indonesian Tax Dispute Resolution in Cooperative Paradigm Compared to the United Kingdom and Australia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 175(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012203

Kalogeropoulos, K., Stathopoulos, N., Tsatsaris, A., & Chalkias, C. (2019). A survey of the Geoinformatics uses for census purposes and the INSPIRE maturity within Statistical Institutes of EU and EFTA countries. Annals of GIS, 25(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2019.1595724

Lai, C. J. (2019). Rhetorical traps and China's peaceful rise: Malaysia and the Philippines in the South China Sea territorial disputes. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 19(1), 117–146. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcx008

Latifah, E., & Imanullah, M. N. (2018). The role of Arbitration in promoting compliance to climate change law. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 200(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/200/1/012045

Leake, T. (2020). Arbitration waiver and prejudice. Michigan Law Review, 119 places.(2), 397–424. https://doi.org/10.36644/mlr.119.2.arbitration

Masse, R. A., & Rusli, M. (2018). Islamic Banking Dispute Resolution in National Sharia Arbitration Board. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 175(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012169

Nugroho, A., Sulistyowati, E., & Hikmah, N. (2018). A juridical review of partnership agreements that have the elements of work agreements in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 953(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012169

Oppong, R. F. (2021). The Nature and Constitutionality of Statutorily-Imposed (Non-Contractual) Arbitration in Ghana. Journal of African Law, 65(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185532100019X

Progunova, L., Voronova, T., Bogatyreva, S., & Kostyukova, O. (2019). Innovative aspects of preferential rules of goods originating in the economy of global chains: Applicability for the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 497(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/497/1/012048

Riyanto, B., Sekartaji, H. T., & Musjtari, D. N. (2018). The Repositioning Mediation Court Model in Civil Dispute Resolution with Justice. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 175(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012183

Runtung, P., Syafrudin Kalo, P., Budiman Ginting, P., Pinem, S., Runtung, Hum, S. H. M., Syafrudin Kalo, Hum, S. H. M., Budiman Ginting, & Hum, S. H. M. (2020). Alternative dispute resolution in traffic accidents in North Sumatera highway. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 452(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/452/1/012074

Science, E. (n.d.). Indonesia's s coffee and cocoa agribusiness opportunities in Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership trade cooperation Indonesia's s coffee and cocoa agribusiness opportunities in Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership trade cooperation. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/892/1/012071

Yin, W. (2021). Domestic arbitral institutions and foreign direct investment. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 21(3), 401–429. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcaa003

Yu Yaskova, N., & Zaitseva, L. I. (2020). Alternatives of judicial, economic disputes settlement in investment and construction sphere. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 880(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/880/1/012116

Zaki, M. R. S., & Syahputra, R. (2021). Realism mechanism in Indonesian and European Union trade disputes regarding CPO commodity exports. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 729(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/729/1/012134

Zhang, H., & Zhu, M. (2020). Comprehensive Economic Evaluation of Our Provinces Factor-based Analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1670(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1670/1/012044




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v8i2.2947

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia INDEXED BY :

/