KAJIAN YURIDIS MENGENAI UPAYA HUKUM DAN AKIBAT HUKUM TERHADAP PENETAPAN TERSANGKA TANPA BUKTI YANG CUKUP
Abstract
Investigations are carried out by the Police in order to collect evidence of a criminal act, with the aim of finding the suspect. To prevent the suspect from escaping, the investigation is accompanied by coercive measures such as arrest and detention. The determination of the suspect violates the human rights of the reported party, for this reason, investigators are required to first collect two pieces of evidence, but what happens if the reported party is designated as a suspect without sufficient evidence. This research was conducted to find out the legal remedies that can be taken by the reported party if the police determine the reported party as a suspect without attaching sufficient evidence, and what the legal consequences will be for the complainant if the report is not proven. The type of research used is normative law by collecting legal materials in the form of file studies or reference books, articles, documents. the type of research used is normative legal research, so the approach used is the legal approach, the concept approach. The writing of this study uses primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, the results of the study show that legal remedies that can be taken by the reported party are in the form of summoning expert witnesses when the case is held or pre-trial, this is based on positive law as a form of legal protection for the reported party written in the Act. -Law No. 8 of 1981, Regulation of the Chief of Police of the Republic of Indonesia No. 14 2012.
Keywords: Confirmation of Suspect, Investigation, Legal Action
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A. Buku.
Abdurahman Soerjono, Metode Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Rineke Cipta, 2003).
Andi Hamzah, Terminologi Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Sinar Harapan, 2008).
Bambang Sunggono, Metode Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2013).
Chandra M Hamzah, Penjelasan Hukum (Restatement) Bukti Permulaan Yang Cukup (Jakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia [PSHK], 2014).
Eato, “Keabsahan Alat Bukti Dan Barang Bukti Pada Perkara Pidana.â€
M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006).
Ramdlon Naning, Gatra Ilmu Negara (Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1982).
Umi Chulsum dan Windy Novia, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (Surabaya: Kashiko, 2006).
B. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1981, Hukum Acara Pidana.
Peraturan Kapolri No. 14 Tahun 2012 Tentang Manajemen Penyidikan Tindak Pidana.
C. Jurnal.
Aldi Indra Tambuwun, “Sanksi Terhadap Saksi Yang Memberikan Keterangan Palsu Di Atas Sumpah Berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Pasal 242 Tentang Sumpah Palsu Dan Keterangan Palsu,†Lex Privatum 4, no. 6 (2016).
Dahlan & Suhaimi Darwin, “Analisis Yuridis Putusan Praperadilan Dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana,†Jurnal Mercatoria 12, no. 1 (2019).
Erdianto Effendi, “Relevansi Pemeriksaan Calon Tersangka Sebelum Penetapan Tersangka,†Undang: Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 2 (2020).
Gerald Majampoh, “KESAKSIAN PALSU DI DEPAN PENGADILAN DAN PROSES PENANGANANNYA,†Lex Crimen 2, no. 1 (2013).
Yohanes Usfunan Putu Prashanti Vahini Kumara, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Gelar Perkara Dalam Proses Penyidikan Sebagai Upaya Pengungkapan Tindak Pidana Di Indonesia†(n.d.).
Yurina Ningsi Eato, “Keabsahan Alat Bukti Dan Barang Bukti Pada Perkara Pidana,†Lex Crimen VI, no. 2 (2017).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v8i1.2457
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia INDEXED BY :
