PENEGAKAN HUKUM KORUPSI POLITIK DI INDONESIA PERMASALAHAN DAN ISU-ISU KONTEMPORER
Abstract
As we know that corruption is happening in Indonesia today, it has been in a very severe and entrenched position in every life. The development of corruption from year to year is increasing rapidly, both in losses suffered by the state and the quantity and quality that are increasingly systematic. The increase in corruption that is out of control will bring disaster to the life of the national economy and the life of the nation and state. The occurrence of corruption cases in Indonesia has no idea who the limits are, why or how. Even many state officials are corrupt. Not only only state officials who commit corruption. Now the corruption case in Indonesia seems to have been an ordinary thing and can be called a phenomenon. The implementation of a clean country is important and necessary to avoid corrupt practices in circulation which not only involve the state officials, but also their families and cronies, which if allowed by the Indonesian people will be in a disadvantaged position. Besides that, in practice there are still neglected matters, because the judges' decisions are unclear and unequivocal distinguish a nominal loss of the state lost due to the convict's actions. This means that the Judge has not distinguished a definition regarding the element of enriching or benefiting himself or anyone else. This difference should be put forward by the Judge in its decision, so that the classification between corruption acts that are detrimental to the state's economy (state losses have already occurred in real terms or state finances have also begun to decrease) should be seen. According to Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya said that corruption is not only carried out by state administrators, or between state administrators, but also other parties, namely families, businessmen and cronies, so that damaging the welfare of the nation and state also endangers the existence of the country.
Keywords: corruption, nepotism, state economy, welfare, collusion.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A. Buku
College, Wellesley. 1978. Corruption: A study in Political Economy. Academic Press, INC.
Dewi S, Tan, Evi Ratna, 2017, Analisis Kasus Korupsi Dana Bantuan Partai Politik PPP Kota Jepara. Thesis, Unika Soegijapranata, Semarang.
Edward Aspinall dan Mada Sukmajati 2015, Politik Uang di Indonesia: Patronase dan Klientelisme pada Pemilu Legislatif 2014, PolGov, Yogyakarta.
Febari, Rizki, 2015, Politik Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Indriati, Etty. 2014. Pola dan Akar Korupsi. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Putra Jaya, Nyoman Serikat. Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Kolusi dan Nepotisme di Indonesiaâ€. Badan Penerbit UNDIP, Semarang.
Widoyoko, Danang, 2013, Oligarki dan Korupsi Politik Indonesia: Strategi Memutus Oligarki dan Reproduksi Korupsi Politik, Setara Press, Jakarta.
B. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
C. Jurnal, Tesis, Prosiding, Internet.
Arifin, Ridwan; Utari, Indah Sri; dan Subondo, Herry. 2016. “Upaya Pengembalian Aset Korupsi yang Berada di Luar Negeri (Asset Recovery) dalam Penegakan Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesiaâ€, Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies (IJCLS) Vol. 1 No.1.
__________; Waspiah, dan Latifiani, Dian. 2018. Penulisan Karya Ilmiah untuk Mahasiswa Hukum. Semarang: BPFH UNNES.
__________. 2015. “The Implemen-tation of Mutual Legal Assistance in the Context of Assets Recovery between Indonesia and Singaporeâ€, Thesis, Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
_________. 2015. “Analisis Hukum Internasional dalam Perampasan Aset di Negara Kawasan Asia Tenggara Berdasarkan United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) dan ASEAN Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (AMLAT)â€, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, Vol. 3 No. 1.
Darmawan, Ikhsan. 2013. “Bentuk Resolusi Konflik dalam Pilkada: Kasus Pilkada Kota Yogyakarta dan Kabupaten Jepara,†Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, Vol. 1, No. 1, DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.1.1.2010.63-83
Hartanto. 2017. “Korupsi Perbuatan Tak Bermoral Menjatuhkan Wibawa Bangsa dan Merampas Kesejahteraan Rakyatâ€, Prosiding Peran Perguruan Tinggi dalam Upaya Penanggulang-an Korupsi,
Hidayat, Sabrina. 2017. “Tinjauan Yuridis Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Melakukan Penyidikan Penggabungan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Pencucian Uangâ€. Halu Oleo Law Review, Vol. 1 No. 2, 2017, hlm. 180-195. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v1i2.3641
Pakpahan, Aknolt Kristian; Triwibowo, Albert; dan Magetsari, Raden Roro Mirna Astari. 2013. “Pemberantasan Korupsi dan Kemauan Politik di Indonesiaâ€. Jurnal Pertahanan dan Bela Negara. Vol. 3. No. 1., hlm. 37-67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33172/jpbh.v3i1.375
Saragih, Yasmirah Mandasari; Prasetyo, Teguh dan Hafidz, Jawade. 2018. “Analisis Yuridis Kewenangan Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagai Penuntut Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsiâ€. UNIFIKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Vol. 5. No. 1.
Nurhasanah. 2016. “Efektivitas Pengendalian Internal, Audit Internal, Karakteristik Instansi dan Kasus Korupsiâ€. Jurnal Tata Kelola & Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, Vol 2. No 1. hlm. 27-48. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.28986/jtaken.v2i1.35
Nurhayati, Siti. 2016. Peningkatan Pendidikan Antikorupsi di Lembaga Pendidikan Islam Al Ma’aarij Desa Pacalan Kecamatan Plaosan Kabupaten Magetan. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on University-Community Engagement, 2-5 Agustus 2016, Surabaya– Indonesia.
Olan Laurance Hasiholan Pasaribu, Iman Jauhari, Elvi Zahara. 2017. “Kajian Yuridis terhadap Putusan Bebas Tindak Pidana Korupsiâ€. Jurnal Mercatoria. Vol 1. No 2.
Simanjuntak, Mangisi. 2016. “Mengungkap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dari Pembuktian Terbalik dan Laporan Harta Kekayaan Penyelenggara (LHKKPN)â€. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara. Vol. 7. No. 1.
Treisman, Daniel. 2000. “The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Studyâ€. Journal of Publics Economics. Vol. 76. No. 3.
G, John, Peters. 2010. “Political Corruption in America: a Search for Definitions and a Theoryâ€. American Political Science Association. Vol. 72. No. 3.
Andersson, Staffan, Paul. 2009. “The Politics of Perception: Use and Abuse of Transparency Inter-national’s Approach to Measuring Corruptionâ€. Political Studies. Vol. 57.
Canache, Damarys; Michael E. Allison. 2005. “Perceptions of Political Corruption in Latin American Democraciesâ€. Latin American Politics & Society, Vol. 47. No. 3.
Purbolaksono, Arfianto. “Korupsi Politik di Kasus e-KTPâ€. https://www.theindonesianinstitute.com/korupsi-politik-di-kasus-e-ktp/ diakses pada 13 Maret 2019.
Okezone. “Dalami Kasus Suap Bupati Cirebon, KPK Periksa Nico Siahaanâ€. https://nasional.sindonews.com/read/1358888/13/dalami-kasus-suap-bupati-cirebon-kpk-periksa-nico-siahaan-1543556289, diakses pada 30 November 2019, pukul 12:38 WIB.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v5i2.1108
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia INDEXED BY :
