THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GRAMMAR TRANSLATION METHOD (GTM) IN THE DIGITAL LEARNING OF READING COMPREHENSION

Muhamad Darki As’ari, Riana Arisandi Budiman, Rizky Muhammad Nur Alam, Sisy Aliviya S

Abstract


This study aims at investigating the implementation of Grammar Translation Method (GTM) in the digital learning of reading comprehension. Noticeably, this study focuses on the students’ responses towards its implementation. This study occupied the qualitative method. The data were then obtained using observation and questionnaire to address the first and second study aims respectively. The data of this study were obtained from 10 students of the first semester of English education, Suryakancana University. The results of the data analysis show that the implementation of GTM assists students in the reading comprehension process. Moreover, this method can be well suited to the digital learning despite the fact that this method is one of the classic methods. Students also gave positive responses of the method even though they spent more time in the translation steps and in comprehending the text in the target language

Full Text:

PDF 350-357

References


Alexander, L.G. (1983). Where do we go from here? A reconsideration of some basic assumptions affecting course design. English Language Teaching, 30(2), pp. 89-103.

Anderson, N. J. (1999). Exploring second language reading: Issues and strategies. Heinle & Heinle.

Archambault, L., et al. (2016). Professional development 2.0. Jourmal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. 4(1), pp. 53-74

Butler, H. A. (2012). Halpern critical thinking assessment predict real-world outcmes of critical thinking. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 26(5), pp. 28-51

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principle and Interactive Approach to language pedagogy. Longman Inc.

Cakrawati, L. M. (2017). Students’ perceptions on the use of online learning platforms in EFL classroom. English Language Teaching and Technology Journal. 1(1), pp. 22–30.

Chakraborty, M., & Muyia, N. F. (2014). Strengthening student engagement: What do students want in online courses?. European Journal of Training and Developmen. 38(9), pp. 782–802

Croft, N., Dalton, A., & Grant, M. (2010). Overcoming isolation in distance learning: Building a learning community through time and space. Journal for Education in the Built Environment. 5(1), pp. 27-64

Dunlap, J., et al. (2016). What sunshine is to flowers: A literature review on the use of emoticons to support online learning. Elsevier.

European Commission (2001). The eLearning Action Plan: Designing tomorrow’s education. http://www.elearningeuropa.info.

Famularsih, S. (2020). Students’ Experiences in Using Online Learning Applications Due to COVID-19 in English Classroom. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(2), pp. 112–121.

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and Researching Reading. Pearson Education Longman.

Harmer & Jeremy. (2007). How to Teach English. Pearson Education Limited.

Haron, N. N., Yasmin, H.Z., & Ibrahim, N.A. (2015). E-learning as a platform to learn English among ESL learners: Benefits and barriers. In Mahani, S., & Haliza, J. (Eds.), Research in Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 79-106).

Hwee, L. K., & Chai, C. S. (2018). Enhancing and modeling teachers’ design beliefs and efficacy of technological pedagogical content knowledge for 21st century quality learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 0(0), pp. 1-25

Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Educational Teachnology. 46(1), pp. 4-29

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approach (5th ed.). Sage.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Mustafa, M. B. (2015). One size does not fit all: Students’ perceptions about Edmodo at Al Ain University of Science & Technology. Journal of Studies in Social Sciences. 13(2), pp. 135–160

Ngalomba, S. (2020). ¬E-learning – Time for a paradigm shift. University World News (African Edition).

Noll, K. L. (1999). Looking on the bright side of israel’s history. Biblical Interpretation, 7(1), pp.1–27.

Okita, S. Y. (2012). Social interactions and learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 3104-3107). Springer.

Orlando, J., & Attard, C. (2015). Digital natives come of age: The reality of today’s early career teachers using mobile devices to teach mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 28(1), pp. 107–121

Purwanto, A., et al. (2020). The effects of transformational, transactional, authentic, authoritarian leadership style toward lecture performance of private university in Tangerang. Dinasti International Journal of Digital Business Management. 1(1), pp. 29-42

Putri, Kartika CS. (2012). A Comperative Study Between Direct Method and Grammar Translation Method to Students’ English Lerning Achievements A Case Study at SMA Negeri 1 Narmada in School Year 2011/2012.

Rohman, M., et al. (2020). Online learning in higher education during Covid-19 pandemic: Students’ perceptions. Talent Development & Excellence. 12(2), pp. 3644-3651

Setiyadi, B. (2020). Teaching English as a foreign language (2nd ed.). Graha Ilmu.

Suherdi, D. (2012). Towards the 21st Century English Teacher Education: An Indonesian Perspective. Bandung: Celtic Press.

Zhao, F. (2003). Enhancing the quality of online higher education through measurement. Quality Assurance in Education. 11(4), pp. 214-221




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35194/cp.v0i0.1371

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.